"What do you feel is the most divisive issue in the church today?”
That was the question put to a small group of guys that meet on Sunday nights, to discuss that morning’s sermon and go through a book of the Bible and just talk about life in general.
It’s a question that has as many answers as there are people who go – or have gone – to church, whatever type of church it may be.
Our answers ranged from the issues that split the Methodist church (how to address same-sex marriage and ordination of gay clergy) to worship music (often the most contentious issue in a lot of churches). This group is made up of guys from a variety of denominational backgrounds who now attend a non-denominational church, so there was some discussion related to individual experiences with our various church backgrounds.
In the end, we kind of settled on an answer similar to that of G. K. Chesterton, who, when the Times of London reportedly sent an inquiry to a number of famous authors asking the question “What’s wrong with the world today?” is said to have responded with a two-word answer: “I am.”
We decided the most divisive issue in the church is people.
There are no perfect churches. There is a lot of “church jumping,” people going from church to church every few years hoping to find the perfect one. The problem is, as the English pastor Charles Spurgeon (known as the ‘Prince of Preachers’) once said, “If I had never joined a church till I had found one that was perfect, I should never have joined one at all; and the moment I did join it, if I had found one, I should have spoiled it, for it would not have been a perfect church after I had become a member of it.”
I was told by the director of a non-profit I support that there are roughly 1,000 churches in the Birmingham, Al. metropolitan area where I live, serving a population of about one million people. Despite what some people who are not from here may think, my guess is I could walk into almost any one of those 1,000 churches and be welcomed.
That’s not to say they all worship the way I prefer to worship, or the music is the music I like, or even that the theology is consistent from church to church. And theology is important, particularly the central theology that Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection offer my only hope of forgiveness and eternal salvation.
Don’t get me wrong: There are certainly other important theological issues. But I saw a t-shirt once that said, “If God is your father, then you are my brother.” If we agree on the nature of God, then that’s a critical starting point from which to discuss everything else.
For all the disagreements on style and, perhaps in some cases, substance, a number of congregations from urban and suburban Birmingham gather on a regular basis for something called “United We Pray.” Christians cross community lines to come together on a Saturday every few months to meet with each other and pray for specific issues facing our community, primarily around racial reconciliation. The goal: to love one another in a way the world could see. People who, in many cases, would never see each other on a daily basis – of different races, economic status, education, whatever - sit together, discuss what to pray about, and then pray together. It’s a pretty powerful event, particularly if you are familiar with the history of Birmingham. For a few minutes, it’s pretty close to being a “perfect” church.
Then we go back to our communities, to our imperfect congregations.
Because my guess is, none of these churches are perfect. But that’s been true since the earliest churches, otherwise (as my pastor recently said) the Apostle Paul wouldn’t have had to write so many letters!
But maybe we’re a little more perfect for trying.
German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer once said, “The person who’s in love with their vision of community will destroy community.” We see that happening around us in our country, every day. The people who are committed to their singular vision of how we’re supposed to live, of what we’re supposed to say, of how we’re supposed to think often become so single-minded in their pursuit of perfection that they will not accept anyone who has a different vision.
That’s not to say we accept everything everybody says. Sometimes people – myself included - are wrong. Correction is not a bad thing.
But at the same time, I think it’s too easy to disregard or even treat people who don’t see things the way we do with disdain, to retreat to that group of people who agree with me and the way I think things “ought to be.”
Let me take that back. I think quite a few of us agree on how things “ought to be.” The disagreement tends to come in how best to make it happen.
When I worked for a United States’ congressman, part of my job was to take the calls from the people who disagreed with positions the congressman took or government policy. Often, they were very angry and aggressive. I developed a habit of saying to them, “I think we both want the same thing. We want to live in a country where people are treated equally, where kids get a good education, where we can be safe and make a decent living and raise our families without fear. We just disagree on how to do that.”
Very often it changed the tone of the conversation from antagonism to trying to find common ground. Sometimes we grudgingly came to agree with parts of what the other person said. But even when we didn’t, we were often able to find a measure of respect for each other. Some of these people became friends, even though we would probably never vote the same way. But the conversation was a start.
I fear too many of us see people who we disagree with and immediately start from a position that these other people are is crazy and want to destroy the country. When that happens, it becomes incredibly difficult to ask reasonable questions, or listen to them to figure out what they really want (and they may indeed want to destroy the country!), or to just be curious about why they believe what they believe, what they have been through, what they really want to ultimately see happen.
If you’ve already decided that person is crazy, it’s tough to have effective communication. A guy I know who I like told me he believes all the people that voted a certain way (and I won’t say which way, it doesn’t matter) should be locked up and never allowed to vote again. That’s around 70 million of his “fellow” Americans and he told me he refuses to listen to them, that they don’t deserve to be heard or shouldn’t even be allowed to speak.
How do you overcome that?
Go back to Bonhoeffer’s quote. He didn’t stop with the negative on destroying a community. He went on to say, “But the person who loves the people around them will create community everywhere they go.”
Again - not the person who agrees with the people around him, but the person who loves people, even the stupid ones.
Another Christian writer and thinker whose books I have enjoyed, Donald Miller, said, “When you stop expecting people to be perfect, you can like them for who they are.”
That’s really the mark of the church. We recognize that we’re all imperfect, that none of us are God, that we’re trying to navigate our way through this world the best we can, hopefully reading and correctly interpreting Scripture, growing with other like-minded people we sit next to in our pews on Sunday.
And that we take that sense of community beyond the doors of our church.
C.S. Lewis wrote, “It would be quite wrong to think the way to become (loving) is to sit and try to manufacture affectionate feelings … The rule for us is perfectly simple. Do not waste time bothering whether you “love” your neighbor; act as if you did. As soon as we do this we (will learn) one of the great secrets: When you are behaving as if you loved someone, you will presently come to love them.”
Or, as John wrote in his Gospel (13:35), “By this all people will know you are my disciples: if you have love for one another.”
I’m not saying it’s easy. But it’s worth the effort.